The simple version is this: most people should use Full. Lite is the better fit only when you already care about keeping more of the underlying toolchain boundary explicit.
This is not a fake “pro vs basic” split. The main difference is whether you want the smoother default setup path or you want more of the environment boundary to stay under your own control.
Compare
Full
Lite
Best for
Most people who want the cleanest first-run path.
Power users who prefer managing more of the toolchain boundary themselves.
Setup feel
Lower-friction install story with fewer manual decisions up front.
More explicit and hands-on if you already know what you want to manage.
When to choose it
You want to install, open the app, and get moving quickly.
You already care about yt-dlp, ffmpeg, aria2, or related pieces staying under your control.
Main tradeoff
Less explicit control over the setup boundary compared with Lite.
More setup responsibility and more room for manual friction.
Choose Full if...
You want the cleanest recommendation and do not want to overthink the setup path.
you just want to install and get moving
you are not trying to manually manage the wider toolchain boundary
you want the path the site is clearly recommending
Choose Lite if...
You already know why you prefer the more hands-on path.
you already care about managing more of the dependency/toolchain boundary
you accept a more explicit setup tradeoff
you do not need the site to smooth the path for you
Next move
If you still are not sure, use Full.
The safest default is still Full. Use the download page if you want the full trust and install context in one place.